Cohousing communities like this one in Nevada City, California, serve as models for the slow homes movement. Credit: McCamant & Durrett Architects
I recently drove through Lakewood, a city 10 miles south of Los Angeles, just to see for myself what it looked like. Lakewood is the quintessential “fast homes” community—the housing equivalent of a fast-food order of “17,500 happy meals to go, please.”
In 1950, the Lakewood Park Company began building homes at the rate of 50 per day. They did not stop until 17,500 single family homes blanketed the former sugar beet fields, leaving little sign of the lakes or woods you'd expect to see in a place named “Lakewood.”
As I recall, Lakewood now looks more or less like this:

Lakewood is hardly unique. The post-WWII era brought us, like never before, individually wrapped lives—not shareable lives. We got mass-produced single-family homes, and a culture built around single-family expectations.
Fast homes shaped fast, isolated lives. In taking on their single-family dwellings and their single-family mortgages, families took on the heavy responsibility of meeting material needs independently.
Thus arose a fixation on convenience—on foods that were ready fast, on household appliances and gadgets that save time, on cars that get us to work with little hassle.
Since then, things have only gotten faster. We move so fast these days that we rarely slow down to talk to our neighbors, much less have them over for dinner.
The fastness pervades not only the way we build our homes and live in them, but also the way we buy and sell them.
In recent years, many of us made offers on houses, obtained financing, and quickly signed long, jargon-filled contracts and promissory notes without really reading them or fully understanding our promises. Today, so-called “successful” homeowners treat a home as an investment, buying when the market it low, selling when it’s high, moving into a bigger home, maybe flipping that one later, and on and on.
Our housing market also incentivizes wastefulness, as the cost of tearing down a perfectly good small house and replacing it with a “McMansion” or “Garage Mahal” is often small compared to the potential increase in property value. The housing market ends up looking, more or less, like this:

My realtor friend Cassandra Ferrera said it well: “Our homes should not be a stock market!”
Especially when stock markets are so prone to crashing. After a year of terrible foreclosures, it now seems that fast homes didn’t work out so well.
What is "Slow"?
Now is our opportunity to rebuild our lives around slow homes.
Slow is the opposite of “fast,” and the opposite of our industrialized society’s approach to growing and making food, building houses, manufacturing goods, extracting resources from the planet, and so on.
This approach has proven to be unsustainable to our planet, economy, health, and sanity—and “slow” movements are the response. Slow Food seeks to revive our “quiet material pleasure” in food, with a commitment to “good, clean, and fair food” and recognition of the “strong connections between plate and planet.” Slow Money is a movement to “bring money back down to earth” by building local economies and connecting investors to the places they live. There’s also Slow Parenting, Slow Medicine, Slow Travel, Slow Schools, Slow Cities, Slow Books, and Slow Living.
Good, Clean, Fair
And now Slow Homes. Recently, I had a slow lunch with two realtors from Regenerative Real Estate and one from Green Key Real Estate. These innovative realtors told me that they don’t just market houses, they market lifestyles. They told me how they help residents connect to their surrounding environments, live sustainably, and create communities that foster interaction and sharing.
That's one way to describe a “slow homes movement.” There are, perhaps, other ways: sustainable homes, cooperative homes, intentional community, and so on. But to me, the word “slow” encompasses all that is “good, clean, and fair,” and it provides an even bigger umbrella under which to start rethinking everything about homes.
We are not the first to use the phrase “slow homes.” John Brown, an architect and realtor in Calgary, Canada, has already made significant headway into describing slow homes. His project, “Slow Home: Design School For Real Life,” has created a definition:
A Slow Home is SIMPLE, LIGHT, and OPEN. It is simple to use and fits the way you want to live. It is light on the environment and your finances and has open, flexible spaces that have a strong connection with the outdoors.
Brown’s ideas are beautiful, his designs are graceful, and they make sense.
Talking Slow Homes
Brown’s picture of Slow Homes can help us start an even longer conversation—or a movement, really.
Re-envisioning homes—something so intertwined with our economy, our forests, our daily lives, and our basic needs—is no small task, and it demands lots of participation.
As an attorney, I may add to the conversation with ideas about home ownership structures, finance, and land use. But mortgage brokers, lenders, realtors, planners, accountants, economists, ecologists, biologists, designers, artists, landscapers, engineers, and anyone with or without a home should be a part of this conversation. It’s a big job, and we’ve all got to do it.
And we have the added challenge of starting where we are and working with what is there—on a planet that is already covered in houses and residential buildings. We can’t start this slow homes movement in the countryside on the few remaining plots of unspoiled land. And we can’t just tear down the homes we have now and replace them.
Unlike the slow food movement, which can sort of get a fresh start with every harvest season, the slow homes movement will take place in apartment towers, concrete jungles, and tract homes. It means we must work and live inside these boxes, but think way outside the box as we recreate, retrofit, renovate, and redesign them.
In part two of "The Slow Homes Manifesto," I propose six goals for the slow homes movement:
- Create housing that facilitates interaction, community, and sharing
- Make our homes part of a sustainable ecosystem and encourage residents to cook, eat, sleep, work, consume, and live more sustainably
- Build homes that are efficient, adaptable, and co-created by the people that live in them
- Provide comfortable, secure, healthy, and beautiful environments for residents
- Redesign our housing market and industry to ensure fairness and access
- Rethink city planning, zoning, and legal structures to facilitate our transition into slow homes and slow communities.
You can read the second part here—and please share your thoughts on slow homes by leaving a comment.
Comments
I was hoping for a little more clarification of what you meant, but the picture window example of the last response got me thinking about the home I lived in before my current condo. I had an adorable house, a Sears Starlight from 1922. These were mass produced homes sold as complete customizable kits and shipped all over the country by rail, then you handled assembly-either by a contractor or yourself if you were able/so inclined. It was from an era where front porches were almost mandatory and the windows were naturally set up to catch a great breeze from any direction. I was the second family to live there having bought it from an estate, and since I am a serious history buff, I restored it to what I'll call modern period. Kitchen, bath heating/cooling, and electric became 2000, rest went back to brand-new 1922 with lots of hours combing antique stores across the country for what I thought had been removed or should have been there originally. No, the rooms weren't large by today's standards but I still made it feel roomy and spacious. The best part was redesigning my yard and getting to know my neighbors by trading plants and hearing encouraging words as people walked by admiring my work.
I sold it a couple years ago and moved into a condo in downtown Chicago to be closer to work, thinking being downtown would be a huge bonus for my social life as a single woman...yes, I am close to lots of friends and amenities, but out in the burbs I knew my neighbors all up and down the blocks around me and here I can't even say I know the people in my building as well. Before it wasn't an issue if I forgot to lock my doors as folks watched out for each other, now when I go out of town, my flowers die because no one can spare the time to water them.
All this seems a pretty good example that faster isn't better for the soul.
If anyone knows of a neighborhood like this inside the Chicago city limits, please reply! Thanks!
Reminds me of the Ahwahee Principles for Resource-Efficient Communities available here.
These seem in need of a Shareable update which Janelle offers, though I would suggest a couple ideas to consider as well:
-Include services like tool libraries, childcare and eldercare coops, car sharing, bike sharing, bulk purchasing, media sharing, and shared communication services (i.e. wireless mesh networks) in the community design process. This would better balance the focus on co-creation of the built environment with a focus on the design of community services. And that community design would become more interdisciplinary and less dominated by architects. I envision, at a minimum, a merging of the disciplines of architecture and service design.
-Use standards in the design process so that co-creators better understand the environmental impact of design decisions. One possibility is using a footprint calculator for communities similar to the ones Global Footprint Network have developed for individuals, businesses, and nations.
Any other ideas to consider?
Pics of 120 living houses from around the world - text in English or Danish:
http://www.dr.dk/DR2/Friland/Levende+Huse/
Cool link Niels. Examples from many nations. Denmark is the birthplace of cohousing. And indigenous people are the original slow homers.This reminds me that slow homes are an ageless, international phenomenon.
Lots of great ideas at the link Neils shared as well including a set of homes built into a hillside for energy efficiency, straw bale houses at a food forest learning center, and low cost housing solutions.
Great article Janelle -- thanks for capturing so many of the ideas of the "slow homes" movement in one place. I find that so many of my real estate clients are asking for the same thing: a place to call home, easy flow of indoor/outdoor living (with a space for a garden), and a true sense of community. Often the first requirement they ask for when buying a home is walkability, so that they can feel a part of something, whether it be a neighborhood or Nature.
Janelle,
Thanks for drawing attention to one of America's biggest headaches - nauseating tract homes and McMansions disconnected from community - not to mention horrifically inefficient street patterns (thanks real estate developers!!). After growing up in the Midwest and the South in suburbs where we couldn't walk to much of anything, I later lived in Center City Philadelphia for a few years - what a breath of fresh air. Philly has its shortcomings, but one can walk around to tons of cafes, bookstores, parks, bars, and amazing restaurants. I now live in Southern California... I love the outdoors here, but I can't walk around like I could in Philly, New York, Boston, or DC. Except for the winters, I miss the pedestrian-friendly cities of the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.
When will real estate developers wake up and get a clue about what people need and want? ...maybe 50% of America is obese, diabetic, and depressed because we're sitting on sofas in suburbs alone instead of being active and walking around and interacting with each other?!!
Patrick
I was the second family to live there having bought it from an estate, and since I am a serious history buff, I restored it to what I'll call modern period. Kitchen, bath heating/cooling, and electric became 2000, rest went back to brand-new 1922 with lots of hours combing antique stores across the country for what I thought had been removed or should have been there originally.
After a lifetime in Southern California's car culture, I moved to the tiny city of Trinidad in Humboldt county. I live in a 91 year old 900 square foot cottage. Whenever I step outside, I see someone I know. I walk to the market. Days go by that I don't need to drive. My neighbors look out for me. Like most people here, I've become involved in community service - in a small town, everyone needs to pitch in. I have never been happier. We were meant to live in community. Our nation desperately needs small, walkable communities in which people know each other.
Add comment
Find us on Twitter!
Recent comments
-
1 hour 44 min ago
-
7 hours 25 min ago
-
16 hours 6 min ago
-
21 hours 9 min ago
-
1 day 4 hours ago

Gail Cooper's history of 'Airconditioning America' makes clear that lightweight, cheap housing, with big picture windows that make the house look more expensive and substantial, depend on airconditioning to be livable. The 'fresh' of slow food = the 'fresh air' of slow housing.